From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/34241 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Can I use OpenType fonts with ConTeXt on Windows right now Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:56:59 +0300 Message-ID: <170869058.20070413165659@gmail.com> References: <193850502.20070413162629@gmail.com> <6faad9f00704130640v5f7c96een8c884635373aa78e@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Yatskovsky , mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176472640 3047 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2007 13:57:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "ntg-context-request@ntg.nl" To: "Mojca Miklavec" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Apr 13 15:57:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HcMH7-0006aV-5u for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD1B1FEE3; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28633-06-5; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD32D1FEEC; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE231FEED for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28570-02 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:56:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747251FEEC for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so502829uge for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.82.188.15 with SMTP id l15mr4250351buf.1176472602068; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from penitencely-outset.volia.net ( [77.123.164.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y2sm4510411mug.2007.04.13.06.56.39; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:56:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.98.4) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <6faad9f00704130640v5f7c96een8c884635373aa78e@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:34241 Archived-At: Hello Mojca, Thanks a lot. In other words, XeTeX handles Unicode-coded fonts and the author creates UTF-coded documents. Then those encodings are merged somewhere inside. Do I think right? > On 4/13/07, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: >> Hello Paul, >> Thanks a lot for help with Xetex+Context on Windows. >> And by the way, what is the "uc" encoding? It is not mentioned on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Encodings_and_Regimes > That page should be improved. "uc" stands for Unicode. It might be > that it will become the default encoding for XeTeX in future anyway > (so that it will be possible to drop the explicit usage). "uc" is the > only encoding that makes sense in XeTeX since no other (except > texnansi by a pure chance) is supported there. And you cannot use "uc" > encoding in 8bit TeX (pdfTeX). > Btw: \enableregime[utf-8] is ignored in XeTeX: utf-8 is already the > default input regime. > Perhaps it might make sense to support other 8-bit regimes (it's only > one or two lines of modifications), but well ... the purpose of XeTeX > is too head towards future, not to look back into the past mess of > encodings. > Mojca -- Best regards, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky