From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (Cgl.ntg.nl [5.39.185.202]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61E32228B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:19:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995C6484B10 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:16:55 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: cgl.ntg.nl (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=ntg.nl DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ntg.nl; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-help :list-archive:archived-at:list-id:subject:subject:reply-to :precedence:user-agent:message-id:date:date:from:from :mime-version:received:received:received:received:received; s= cgl; t=1730827015; x=1733419016; bh=juyUox7BAr9BDrgzLSssR4vvLzK/ tYmWfUjB5GDfw7c=; b=kEefdt+Txqv0AxKy3dFjeozvs+pv00oaglu/G+rm+ACF SKEj1TiHW8ceAQHk7dBZfu967Kj0r1LFAQGN20Va5FjkCQBVB3zsTgwV4wIFgIyM 3J1tTpCmmndJTL13fqzWdlrSr4XGq13gvDpFpN6qEDmjN9Abu61Sdh3RrPCpz5k= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PD0XYTlPyJmX for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:16:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C767484EE7 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:16:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9334849D0 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:15:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pbXz1XYiKtP for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:15:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9508D484996 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:15:30 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: louis.ad@hotmail.ch To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:15:30 -0000 Message-ID: <173082693060.1601628.16677952919182338112@cgl.ntg.nl> User-Agent: HyperKitty on http://mailman.ntg.nl/ Message-ID-Hash: IQCL5WWOMKRFBHIWEKWWTHIBL7XLDPZI X-Message-ID-Hash: IQCL5WWOMKRFBHIWEKWWTHIBL7XLDPZI X-MailFrom: louis.ad@hotmail.ch X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: [NTG-context] Expected behaviour of \definelayout List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I am new to ConTeXt and was trying to understand whether the following behaviour of \definelayout is expected. Consider this example, > \setuplayout[grid=yes] > \showgrid > \definelayout[odd][ > backspace=50mm, > width=90mm, > topspace=20mm, > header=0mm, > footer=0mm, > height=250mm, > ] > > \starttext > \showframe > \dorecurse{10}{\input knuth } > \stoptext which I compile with `context example.tex` (ConTeXt Process Management 1.06, current version: 2024.02.27 09:18, obtained via TeXLive 2024). While the document's layout updates on page 2 (at least, what's being shown by \showframe), the text is typeset using the previous (page 1) layout until it encounters the next \par. This repeats on the transition from page 2 to 3. I have tried to look for an answer in the following texts to no avail, - The layout guide: "It's in the details" - The "ConTEXt Mark IV: an excursion" - The mailing list: Peter Hopcroft chimed in with a similar issue in Dec 2022 (which I did not manage to replicate; it appears the solution was to enforce paragraphs at the layout change?) Is this just the expected behaviour of the layout engine or am I missing something in my preamble? I would very much appreciate your insights, thank you in advance! Louis ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________