From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9804 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: About itemize Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:31:29 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <17719242809.20021111223129@iol.it> References: <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> Reply-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037051517 23287 80.91.224.249 (11 Nov 2002 21:51:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18BMTL-00063J-00 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:51:55 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5442510AE9; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:53:33 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A61E10AE8 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:52:58 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from [151.29.141.38] (151.29.141.38) by smtp2.libero.it (6.5.028) id 3DCC003100173B45; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 22:52:56 +0100 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9804 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9804 Monday, November 11, 2002 Idris S Hamid wrote: ISH> Dear posse, ISH> The itemize environment has a strange feature/bug: (This should answer your "quotation" question too, at least partly) All "blocks" have this bug; IIRC it comes from Hans preference of spacey "readable" sources; this means all \par tokens after a \stop are globbed, and (IIRC) a new paragraph is always started: thus the indentnext option *always* take place. IOW, you cannot have one of these blocks *within* a paragraph. Hans, am I right? Well, if I am, this is absolutely wrong. Presence or absence of \pars before and after should not be ignored, or at least should be made an option. My workaround for now is to use \nulls after \stop... commands, but this is somewhat clunky. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta