From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/5064 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Itemization issues Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:06:34 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <1775270405.20010713220634@bigfoot.com> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395680 30928 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:54:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:5064 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:5064 Hi, I discovered some "problems" with setting up itemizations. (1) order is important. Consider the difference between \setupitemize[2][][symbol=5] \setupitemize[each][autointro,packed][before=,margin=standard] and \setupitemize[each][autointro,packed][before=,margin=standard] \setupitemize[2][][symbol=5] (2) what does the option "paragraph" (alinea in dutch) do? (3) with the above setup (autointro), if I have \startitemize \item short item \startitemize \item another item \item one more item \stopitemize \stopitemize a page break is permitted before the internal itemization. Shouldn't it be auto-prevented? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta