From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6806 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Enumerations and itemgroups Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:01:55 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <1777051618.20020204170155@bigfoot.com> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397314 13937 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:21:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6806 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6806 Hello, I have some question on how to appropriately set the parameters to achieve the following: Enumerations: I'd wish to obtain a layout like the following: Normal text. This is a paragraph of norma text, and it has normal margins and normal indentation. Enum 1 This is the enumeration. The head hangs slightly in the margin, and the text wraps just like if it were normal text. This is a new paragraph of the same enumeration. It should indent like normal text as well. So what I want is to (1) let the head hang slightly in the margin (2) let the margin for the enumeration be the same as the normal text (3) let the inner paragraphs of the enumeration hang like in normal text but I cannot find appropriate settings for this. Itemgroups: I defined two itemgroups as follows: \defineitemgroup[numbers] \setupnumbers[each][intro,broad,packed,joinedup][left=(,stopper=),symbol=n,margin=standard] \defineitemgroup[bullets] \setupbullets[each][intro,broad,packed,joinedup][symbol=1,margin=standard] and I notice that there is some inconsistent layout when I mix them. For example, if I use 'bullets' as a sublevel of 'bullets', or 'numbers' as a sublevel of 'numbers', there is no empty line before the inner one (and this is correct). But if I use 'bullets' within 'numbers' or 'numbers' within 'bullets', an empty line is put before the inner level, like if joinedup had been ignored. Why is that? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta