From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/10156 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: Reference + footnote = bug Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:07:56 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <1778804370.20021217120756@iol.it> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021217101701.0340b448@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1040123376 28600 80.91.224.249 (17 Dec 2002 11:09:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18OFbT-0007R7-00 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:09:35 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40C910B0C; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:09:58 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtp1.libero.it (smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E3E10B09 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:08:50 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from [151.29.131.200] (151.29.131.200) by smtp1.libero.it (6.7.015) id 3DE22B81009A4D98 for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:08:46 +0100 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20021217101701.0340b448@server-1> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:10156 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:10156 Tuesday, December 17, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: >>See how the word "footnote" is superscripted ... it's an odd bug >>indeed, and it almost seems the footnote can detect the previous >>word ... HH> actually, it kind of does, in case of: HH> word \footnote HH> the footnote will be attached to 'word' and HH> word \footnote {} \footnote {} HH> is also handled (some spacing between both notes, since 1 2 looks better HH> than 12); there's lots of those hidden things in context Ok, I give up: is there some way to do extra manipulation on the previous word? (like, making it a reference, or something) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta