From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/40599 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: ONE upright beta, please! Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:20:25 +0200 Message-ID: <17D97979-DF31-4B0A-B192-66B957133BA6@st.estfiles.de> References: <1CB17E3A-B729-4B5E-B49E-56F789E7AF20@st.estfiles.de> <68bfdc900804220650t58f7ae56je15295b6bec76c32@mail.gmail.com> <4CECB04A-A58E-4C12-8E04-87ACADFE9136@st.estfiles.de> <480DEF96.7060805@elvenkind.com> <68bfdc900804220722s4fb2afd3nbe948fe51bd07c28@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208877807 16039 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2008 15:23:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:23:27 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Apr 22 17:23:57 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JoKKf-0000Ld-4c for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:22:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFD81FD62; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:22:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30811-01-6; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:21:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B711FC84; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:21:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EA01FC77 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30665-01-5 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay08.ispgateway.de (smtprelay08.ispgateway.de [80.67.29.8]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAE81FCD0 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [89.247.29.47] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by smtprelay08.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JoKIh-0002MU-SR for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:20:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <68bfdc900804220722s4fb2afd3nbe948fe51bd07c28@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Df-Sender: 698580 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:40599 Archived-At: for example (Hans in february): "under some circumstances hz may not work as expected ..." I am waiting for summer / Bohinj ;o) Steffen Am 22.04.2008 um 16:22 schrieb Yue Wang: > as far as i am concerned, MKIV is far better than MKII/pdftex, and > have less bugs concerning the internationalization. I use it for > production purpose. I typeset all my essays using luatex, because > pdftex/MKII is messy especially on non-latin typesetting. Yes, > LuaTeX/MKIV had bugs, but Taco and Hans can solve them:) again. > MKII+XeTeX should also produce the right pdf. but I didn't try. (XeTeX > is stable for production, uh?) > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Taco Hoekwater > wrote: >> >> >> Steffen Wolfrum wrote: >>> Am 22.04.2008 um 15:50 schrieb Yue Wang: >>> >>>> Use LuaTeX+MKIV.. >>> >>> >>> well, sure ... LuaTeX is certainly on my todolist, only not at the >>> end >>> of an almost finished project. >>> >>> I assume LuaTeX is not yet mature enough for real production needs >>> as >>> MKII is, right? Taco? >> >> No, I do not think that would be wise. Certainly not for a project >> that >> is nearly finished. >> >> >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________________ >> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an >> entry to the Wiki! >> >> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net >> archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ >> wiki : http://contextgarden.net >> ___________________________________________________________________________________ >> > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an > entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________