From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9822 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[4]: About itemize Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:12:25 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <1862726500.20021112231225@iol.it> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021112091240.02e2e0f0@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112002309.031bcd80@remote-1> <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> <200211111314.39547.ishamid@attbi.com> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112002309.031bcd80@remote-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112091240.02e2e0f0@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20021112191244.03360dc8@server-1> Reply-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037139572 1736 80.91.224.249 (12 Nov 2002 22:19:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18BjNb-0000Rr-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:19:31 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100B910AF4; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:21:12 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EEA10AE8 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:19:21 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from [151.29.130.91] (151.29.130.91) by smtp2.libero.it (6.5.028) id 3DCC0031001FFD8D; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:19:10 +0100 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20021112191244.03360dc8@server-1> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9822 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9822 Tuesday, November 12, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: >>Would it really be that tricky? It should just decide wether to >>skip the next \par or not ... HH> well, the point is that no command, except fr sectioning and index commands HH> look ahead, so what excactly do you mean with 'skip the next par'? Uhm. Ok, let's get at it slowly. I don't know how it works internally, but regadless of this, the behaviour seems to be the same regardless of wether I leave an empty line after the \stop, or not (and also before the \start, or not). Do \starts and \stops automatically force a new paragraph all the time? -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta