From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9649
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Giuseppe Bilotta <gip.bilotta@iol.it>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re[4]: Gamma support in TeXExec?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:54:42 +0200
Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl
Message-ID: <190601835.20021025085442@iol.it>
References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1>
 <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1>
 <5.1.0.14.1.20021020184536.00afa6e0@remote-1>
 <5.1.0.14.1.20021021085206.02ecf2a8@server-1>
 <5.1.0.14.1.20021022101312.02d88548@server-1>
 <10298650241.20021022113335@iol.it> <87lm4nn5oz.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl>
Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta <gip.bilotta@iol.it>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035529541 22645 80.91.224.249 (25 Oct 2002 07:05:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:05:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Return-path: <ntg-context-admin@ref.vet.uu.nl>
Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl)
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 184yXK-0005sb-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@gmane.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:05:38 +0200
Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 680F310AE4; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:06:43 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from smtp3.libero.it (smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.127])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF87510ADD
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:05:54 +0200 (MEST)
Original-Received: from [151.29.140.96] (151.29.140.96) by smtp3.libero.it (6.5.028)
        id 3DB712350009D0FD; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:02:08 +0200
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Business
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Original-To: Olaf Weber <olaf@infovore.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <87lm4nn5oz.fsf@infovore.xs4all.nl>
Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ref.ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl>
List-Subscribe: <http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ref.ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ref.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ref.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ref.ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ref.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9649
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9649


Thursday, October 24, 2002 Olaf Weber wrote:

>> since it's efmt and nfmt, wouldn't consistency call for pfmt,
>> ofmt, eofmt, pefmt ?

OW> Yes, but thanks to the immense success of 8+3 filenames, they could
OW> end up being truncated to pfm, ofm, eof, pef respectively.  ofm is
OW> known to collide with another suffix.

Are there Omega implementations for DOS?

I mean, I think we should stop worrying about this. If an DOS
implementation is indeed done, they can change it with no big
problems.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta