From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8014 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: Broken catcodes Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 23:46:03 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <191782546.20020525234603@bigfoot.com> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020525221717.03514b68@remote-1> Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398448 24085 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:40:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:40:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20020525221717.03514b68@remote-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8014 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8014 Saturday, May 25, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote: HH> At 08:14 PM 5/25/2002 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >>Hello, >> >>I'm testing ConTeXt 2002.05.17 and found out that even at >>protection-level 0 ! ? and @ have catcode 11 instead of 12. I >>wasn't able to see where the messing up occurred, though. HH> can you test the current version? Still bugged in 2002.05.24 --to be precise, @ has catcode 12, but ! and ? have catcode 11. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta