From: "Jan Tosovsky" <j.tosovsky@email.cz>
To: "'mailing list for ConTeXt users'" <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19271.6718804606$1385896093@news.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>
> when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is
> rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or
> more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text).
>
> It can be tested easily:
>
> \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}.
> \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar
>
> Bar}.
>
This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi:
\unexpanded\def\normalnoterule
{\ifvmode
\dontleavehmode \blackrule
[\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor,
\c!width=.2\hsize,
\c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness,
\c!depth=\zeropoint]%
\endgraf
\kern\strutdepth
\fi}
When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is
smaller, but still different.
Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the gap
same, but it leads to extreme thick rule.
What else could be tweaked here?
Thnaks, Jan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-01 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
2013-12-01 11:08 ` Jan Tosovsky [this message]
[not found] ` <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
2014-02-08 11:22 ` Jan Tosovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='19271.6718804606$1385896093@news.gmane.org' \
--to=j.tosovsky@email.cz \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).