* [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position
[not found] <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
@ 2013-12-01 11:08 ` Jan Tosovsky
[not found] ` <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Tosovsky @ 2013-12-01 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'mailing list for ConTeXt users'
On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>
> when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is
> rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or
> more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text).
>
> It can be tested easily:
>
> \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}.
> \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar
>
> Bar}.
>
This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi:
\unexpanded\def\normalnoterule
{\ifvmode
\dontleavehmode \blackrule
[\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor,
\c!width=.2\hsize,
\c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness,
\c!depth=\zeropoint]%
\endgraf
\kern\strutdepth
\fi}
When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is
smaller, but still different.
Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the gap
same, but it leads to extreme thick rule.
What else could be tweaked here?
Thnaks, Jan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position
[not found] ` <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
@ 2014-02-08 11:22 ` Jan Tosovsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Tosovsky @ 2014-02-08 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'mailing list for ConTeXt users'
On 2013-12-01 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> >
> > when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is
> > rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or
> > more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text).
> >
> > It can be tested easily:
> >
> > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}.
> > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar
> >
> > Bar}.
> >
>
> This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi:
>
> \unexpanded\def\normalnoterule
> {\ifvmode
> \dontleavehmode \blackrule
> [\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor,
> \c!width=.2\hsize,
> \c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness,
> \c!depth=\zeropoint]%
> \endgraf
> \kern\strutdepth
> \fi}
>
> When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is
> smaller, but still different.
>
> Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the
> gap same, but it leads to extreme thick rule.
>
After couple of weeks I've updated my Beta and I cannot reproduce the
original behaviour any more!
Thanks for fixing,
Jan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-08 11:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
2013-12-01 11:08 ` [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position Jan Tosovsky
[not found] ` <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz>
2014-02-08 11:22 ` Jan Tosovsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).