From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/85537 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan Tosovsky" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:04 +0100 Message-ID: <19271.6718804606$1385896093@news.gmane.org> References: <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385896082 13799 80.91.229.3 (1 Dec 2013 11:08:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 11:08:02 +0000 (UTC) To: "'mailing list for ConTeXt users'" Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Dec 01 12:08:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([5.39.185.229]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vn4si-0007kQ-LU for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 12:08:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD331020F; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Rpyk7-+NEzFa; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E0F101EF; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:06 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF99101EF for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jGVIX2DrN6B9 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter2-utr.mf.surf.net (filter2-utr.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.153]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FFF101EE for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from fep17.mx.upcmail.net (fep17.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.37]) by filter2-utr.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id rB1BD6Rf031463 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:13:07 +0100 Original-Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20131201110802.UIHL9665.viefep17-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net> for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:08:02 +0100 Original-Received: from emk ([89.176.227.41]) by edge02.upcmail.net with edge id wB821m01V0uDent02B8248; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 12:08:02 +0100 X-SourceIP: 89.176.227.41 In-Reply-To: <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac7nwKyB5Qx81HtFQN6uSvwuH2WvJAGv+cQw Content-Language: cs X-Bayes-Prob: 0.9999 (Score 4.7, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=62.179.121.37; country=AT; latitude=47.3333; longitude=13.3333; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=47.3333,13.3333&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 04KUbd6pC - 161762869951 - 20131201 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.153 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:85537 Archived-At: On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is > rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or > more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text). > > It can be tested easily: > > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}. > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar > > Bar}. > This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi: \unexpanded\def\normalnoterule {\ifvmode \dontleavehmode \blackrule [\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor, \c!width=.2\hsize, \c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness, \c!depth=\zeropoint]% \endgraf \kern\strutdepth \fi} When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is smaller, but still different. Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the gap same, but it leads to extreme thick rule. What else could be tweaked here? Thnaks, Jan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________