* [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position [not found] <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz> @ 2013-12-01 11:08 ` Jan Tosovsky [not found] ` <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Jan Tosovsky @ 2013-12-01 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'mailing list for ConTeXt users' On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is > rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or > more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text). > > It can be tested easily: > > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}. > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar > > Bar}. > This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi: \unexpanded\def\normalnoterule {\ifvmode \dontleavehmode \blackrule [\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor, \c!width=.2\hsize, \c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness, \c!depth=\zeropoint]% \endgraf \kern\strutdepth \fi} When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is smaller, but still different. Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the gap same, but it leads to extreme thick rule. What else could be tweaked here? Thnaks, Jan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz>]
* Re: [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position [not found] ` <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz> @ 2014-02-08 11:22 ` Jan Tosovsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Jan Tosovsky @ 2014-02-08 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'mailing list for ConTeXt users' On 2013-12-01 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is > > rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or > > more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text). > > > > It can be tested easily: > > > > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}. > > \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar > > > > Bar}. > > > > This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi: > > \unexpanded\def\normalnoterule > {\ifvmode > \dontleavehmode \blackrule > [\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor, > \c!width=.2\hsize, > \c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness, > \c!depth=\zeropoint]% > \endgraf > \kern\strutdepth > \fi} > > When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is > smaller, but still different. > > Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the > gap same, but it leads to extreme thick rule. > After couple of weeks I've updated my Beta and I cannot reproduce the original behaviour any more! Thanks for fixing, Jan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-08 11:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <010801cee7c1$2f23e8f0$8d6bbad0$@tosovsky@email.cz> 2013-12-01 11:08 ` [***SPAM***] RE: Footnote line position Jan Tosovsky [not found] ` <000c01ceee85$9b6399a0$d22acce0$@tosovsky@email.cz> 2014-02-08 11:22 ` Jan Tosovsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).