From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/14769 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giuseppe Bilotta Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re[2]: t-nath difficulty Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:23:06 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <1959109726.20040218162306@iol.it> References: <4031085F.2050605@iname.com> <40310F65.2030601@iname.com> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077211136 17033 80.91.224.253 (19 Feb 2004 17:18:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Thu Feb 19 18:18:33 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Atrom-0007Yf-00 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:18:32 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF6710B4D; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:16:43 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mbox.dmi.unict.it (mbox.dmi.unict.it [151.97.252.66]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959E110B24 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:14:04 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from oblomov.dipmat.unict.it (oblomov.dipmat.unict.it [151.97.252.27]) by mbox.dmi.unict.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E06C6F02 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:34:19 +0100 (CET) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <40310F65.2030601@iname.com> Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:14769 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:14769 Monday, February 16, 2004 Gary Pajer wrote: > Gary Pajer wrote: >> I'm taking a look at nath (via t-nath). Here's the very first thing I >> tried: >> >> In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the >> second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct. >> Bug or feature? or setup problem? >> >> \usemodule[nath] >> \starttext >> >> $ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $ >> >> $ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $ >> \stoptext > Furthermore: I tried the LaTeX version of nath. It works as expected > (i.e. the second line produces a fraction) > So, ... it's looking like a bug in t-nath, I think. I flagged your message. I will look into the problem as soon as I have at the time (sorry, pretty busy right now). -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta