verb-ini and nath \(save|restore)catcode clash

verb-ini and nath \(save|restore)catcode clash

[Nikolai Weibull]

Hi, again.
verb-ini and nath both define (incompatible) instances of \save- and
\restorecatcode.  Simply renaming them in nath to
\NATH(save|restore)catcode seems to work fine.  Any suggestions?
	nikolai

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull    :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA    :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden    :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org  :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: verb-ini and nath \(save|restore)catcode clash

[Hans Hagen]

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Hi, again.
> verb-ini and nath both define (incompatible) instances of \save- and
> \restorecatcode.  Simply renaming them in nath to
> \NATH(save|restore)catcode seems to work fine.  Any suggestions?

makes sense, probably it makes sense to namespace most low level nath

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: verb-ini and nath \(save|restore)catcode clash

[Nikolai Weibull]

* Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> [Nov 17, 2004 16:10]:
> > verb-ini and nath both define (incompatible) instances of \save- and
> > \restorecatcode.  Simply renaming them in nath to
> > \NATH(save|restore)catcode seems to work fine.  Any suggestions?

> makes sense, probably it makes sense to namespace most low level nath

Yeah; it's a module after all.  Of course, if nath is going to be
integrated into newmat some day, perhaps now's the time ;-).
	nikolai

--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull    :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA    :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden    :::
::: page: www.pcppopper.org  :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

Re: verb-ini and nath \(save|restore)catcode clash

[Hans Hagen]

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> * Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> [Nov 17, 2004 16:10]:
> 
>>>verb-ini and nath both define (incompatible) instances of \save- and
>>>\restorecatcode.  Simply renaming them in nath to
>>>\NATH(save|restore)catcode seems to work fine.  Any suggestions?
> 
> 
>>makes sense, probably it makes sense to namespace most low level nath
> 
> 
> Yeah; it's a module after all.  Of course, if nath is going to be
> integrated into newmat some day, perhaps now's the time ;-).

how about nath users making a nice test file with samples ... at least we have a 
testbed then

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Re: verb-ini and nath \(save|restore)catcode clash

[Christopher Creutzig]

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> verb-ini and nath both define (incompatible) instances of \save- and
> \restorecatcode.  Simply renaming them in nath to
> \NATH(save|restore)catcode seems to work fine.  Any suggestions?

  I had sent a patch for that some months ago.  Giuseppe, any chance of
an updated t-nath.tex in the near future?  The incompatibility with
\startequation ... \stopequation should also be fixed in some released
version.

regards,
	Christopher

Re[2]: verb-ini and nath \(save|restore)catcode clash

[Giuseppe Bilotta]

Thursday, November 18, 2004 Christopher Creutzig wrote:

> Nikolai Weibull wrote:

>> verb-ini and nath both define (incompatible) instances of \save- and
>> \restorecatcode.  Simply renaming them in nath to
>> \NATH(save|restore)catcode seems to work fine.  Any suggestions?

>   I had sent a patch for that some months ago.  Giuseppe, any chance of
> an updated t-nath.tex in the near future?  The incompatibility with
> \startequation ... \stopequation should also be fixed in some released
> version.

You're right, sorry. I've been rather busy until recently and
I'm only now catching up with the past mail and getting a few
things done.

I'll try to have the new amsl and nath modules out today.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta