From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/566 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wybo Dekker Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Syntax hilight editors Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:15:17 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <199906211515.RAA04606@servalys.hobby.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391418 25118 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:43:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: gilbert@login-bv.com Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:566 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:566 Gilbert wrote: > This is off-topic, but I ran into vim (Vi improved) while searching for a > decent editor for my DVIview project. > My criteria is (always) *good* syntax hi-lighting. Well, this beast does it > all, and it is available for nearly every os, and it's free. What striked me > the most was the specification (look at the .vim files in the syntax > directory), you can do a lot of stuff here. When editing html for instance, > it even bolds the text inside tags (also italics in , etc.). > > It does a good job for TeX, and it even has decent LaTeX > support. Since I So finally here is someone who now understands why I was so stubborn about my loving vi during the last NTG meeting... > use context, I'll create the context higlighting. Well, it seems I'm going > to like linux despite the many things that are *not* obvious about unix. As a linux addict I hate to say that vim work similarly under MS-DOS;-) -- Hartelijke groet, Wybo -- __Servalys Analytical Chemistry Services__ Wybo H. Dekker wybo@servalys.hobby.nl Deilsedijk 60 www.hobby.nl/~servalys 4158 CH Deil tel +31-345-652164 The Netherlands fax +31-345-652383