From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/1293
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Marc van Dongen <dongen@cs.ucc.ie>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: text in defineenumeration
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:26:10 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <199911171626.QAA14359@interzone.ucc.ie>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035392126 31503 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:55:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:55:26 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl (ConTeXt)
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:1293
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:1293

Dear group,

I am trying to define different labels for the
second level of enumerations. I am using something
as follows:

\defineenumeration
   [Block]

\setupenumerations
  [subBlock]
  [conversion=characters,
   text=SubBlock]

The conversion= works fine. However, the
text= does not seem to make any difference
at all. Is text= not supposed to be used
for sub-levels?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Marc van Dongen
_______________________________________________________
     Marc van Dongen, CS Dept | phone:   +353 21 903578
University College Cork, NUIC | Fax:     +353 21 903113
  College Road, Cork, Ireland | Email: dongen@cs.ucc.ie