* itemize[loose]
@ 2006-01-26 20:15 Hans van der Meer
2006-01-27 7:46 ` itemize[loose] Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans van der Meer @ 2006-01-26 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
When typesetting an enumeration with a specified item text I
encountered an error with the combination of [loose] with \sym{} and
\mar{}.
The hope was that "loose" will allow underfull filling of the lines
without complaint (I don't like TeX complaining)
An example follows:
\starttext
\setupitemize[loose]
\startitemize
\sym {xyz} 12345
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Error message:
! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> \optimizeitemsfalse
\p!compareprocessaction ...commalistelement {#3}#2
\expandafter
\quitcommalis...
etc.
Is this expected behaviour? The manual does not give me an idea about
that.
yours sincerely,
dr. H. van der Meer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: itemize[loose]
2006-01-26 20:15 itemize[loose] Hans van der Meer
@ 2006-01-27 7:46 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-01-27 9:03 ` itemize[loose] Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-01-27 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hans van der Meer wrote:
> Error message:
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> <argument> \optimizeitemsfalse
>
> \p!compareprocessaction ...commalistelement {#3}#2
> \expandafter
> \quitcommalis...
> etc.
>
> Is this expected behaviour? The manual does not give me an idea about
> that.
No, the internal macro \dododosetupitemgroupconstant has bug.
The loose line has to be:
\v!loose*=>\setfalse\optimizelistitem,
instead of
\v!loose*=>\optimizeitemsfalse,
But it would not have helped for you underfull hbox messages,
loose is about vertical (pagebreak) optimizations. Your best bet
is \setuptolerance[stretch,verytolerant]
Cheers, taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: itemize[loose]
2006-01-27 7:46 ` itemize[loose] Taco Hoekwater
@ 2006-01-27 9:03 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2006-01-27 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>No, the internal macro \dododosetupitemgroupconstant has bug.
>The loose line has to be:
>
> \v!loose*=>\setfalse\optimizelistitem,
>
>instead of
>
> \v!loose*=>\optimizeitemsfalse,
>
>
>
ah, stupid me, repaired
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-27 9:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-26 20:15 itemize[loose] Hans van der Meer
2006-01-27 7:46 ` itemize[loose] Taco Hoekwater
2006-01-27 9:03 ` itemize[loose] Hans Hagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).