From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15355 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2023 11:37:13 -0000 Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (5.39.185.232) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Jun 2023 11:37:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007F21C38EB; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.ntg.nl Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3eEgAuFIlGj; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A5E1C387C; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C458E1C3930 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.ntg.nl Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5pykUkKgNlb for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:45 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=213.125.118.53; helo=mail.rna.nl; envelope-from=gerben.wierda@rna.nl; receiver= Received: from mail.rna.nl (mail.rna.nl [213.125.118.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DE81C15A9 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (hermione.rna.nl [192.168.2.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by albus.rna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24CC517ED250B for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rna.nl; s=dkim_rsa2048; t=1685705804; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=L+y8rTWEbSVSlPGBcsFNoGCsdD8FAys6P1/TRafSr5s=; b=XTwVJhFr5+JLH7Q+bIqYXWu5ad8RAeucEspVpdMqnPkNnygPz7DYeus5d/AYSaOqiesquE oDeTi0GjaiyfFDxigbW7faM+XYpCrzmNY+vJJknHJKipyGz5X/hHB+hMuzmtnqT2HJ2IrD 6qLf8ClOD/BsWmHsT7A73+ZiT/xxz6LwmL9J7fbrUUf/4VCZ4Ytlo43Q6e233+kYwF5Cdx IWHvHpTiTTpQQ8CiI5PNL1pERusaqbmLadCFSxpgtxMVucrmdTZME/N8CWI3ITEH9T38S/ bMFoz3Uv14Uew2IIzZ8DeJEoroCG5hEl86l+ioS1UFZKmJbYM/v0N6VYnOWstQ== Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.3\)) Message-Id: <1E93444C-0FFD-464A-A127-3A7E5B5D6669@rna.nl> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:36:41 +0200 To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.3) Subject: [NTG-context] Chinese typesetting with macOS font. Which one is a good choice? X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.38 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Gerben Wierda via ntg-context Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Cc: Gerben Wierda Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1993403320570954917==" Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sender: "ntg-context" --===============1993403320570954917== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0D12D694-316E-4B00-8F71-22862D3A6222" --Apple-Mail=_0D12D694-316E-4B00-8F71-22862D3A6222 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 For Japanese I currently use \startsetups [japanese] \setscript [nihongo] \stopsetups \setuplanguage [ja] [setups=3Djapanese] \definefallbackfamily [archimate] [ss] [Hiragino Sans] [preset=3Drange:japanese, tf=3Dstyle:W3, it=3Dstyle:W3, bf=3Dstyle:W5, bi=3Dstyle:W5, force=3Dyes] \definefontfamily [archimate] [ss] [Optima] \setupbodyfont[archimate] I've been wondering what a good choice is for Chinese which is to be = added to my project. Hiragino Sans GB has both Japanese and Chinese but = only W3,W6 I have no knowledge of what is elegant in these fonts. Can someone = advise me? No bitmap fonts. Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn , = Mastodon ) R&A IT Strategy (main site) Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise=C2=A0Architecture = Book: Mastering ArchiMate --Apple-Mail=_0D12D694-316E-4B00-8F71-22862D3A6222 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii For = Japanese I currently use

\startsetups [japanese]
  \setscript [nihongo]
\stopsetups
\setuplanguage [ja] = [setups=3Djapanese]
\definefallbackfamily
  = [archimate]
  [ss]
  [Hiragino = Sans]
  [preset=3Drange:japanese,
  =  tf=3Dstyle:W3,
   it=3Dstyle:W3,
   bf=3Dstyle:W5,
  =  bi=3Dstyle:W5,
   force=3Dyes]
\definefontfamily [archimate] [ss] [Optima]
\setupbodyfont[archimate]


I've been wondering what a good choice = is for Chinese which is to be added to my project. Hiragino Sans GB has = both Japanese and Chinese but only W3,W6

I have no knowledge of what is elegant = in these fonts. Can someone advise me? No bitmap fonts.

= --Apple-Mail=_0D12D694-316E-4B00-8F71-22862D3A6222-- --===============1993403320570954917== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ --===============1993403320570954917==--