Re: Is there anything like developer's manual for ConTeXt?

[David Wooten <dw@trichotomic.net>]

On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Rory Molinari wrote:

> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> Corin Royal Drummond wrote:
>>> Many have voiced the same complaint.  I understand that Hans and  
>>> every
>>> one are occupied with building MKIV (aka LuaTeX), and that  
>>> documentation
>>> is not their highest priority.  There's the wiki, the wonderfully  
>>> active
>>> mailing list, and what used to be decent docs from 2001/2002  
>>> timeframe. But yes, it's a steep hill to climb, made worth it only  
>>> by the relative
>>> awesomeness of ConTeXt.
>> You missed the reference manual rewrite effort (which is now in
>> remission mostly because of an extremely depressing lack of user
>> feedback).
>>  http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Main_Page#Documentation
>
> Hi Taco,
>
> I'm sorry that I haven't given much feedback on the documentation  
> project.  I got through the Typography chapter, but then was so  
> confounded by the Fonts chapter that I didn't feel able to give  
> comments.  I will make another attempt.
>
> Cheers,
> Rory

Hi, I'd like to second what Rory said. I was delighted by my first  
reading of the typography chapter, and had not seen the font chapter  
until you posted the link above, Taco. I'm also sorry not to have  
chimed in before.

Dave

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________