ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Hagen via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Cc: Hans Hagen <j.hagen@freedom.nl>
Subject: Re: \autoinsertnextspace regression / discrepancy, mkiv to lmtx
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:43:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ca8ed7b-102d-8bf5-a57d-08cc00b46687@freedom.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c14c57c3-15b5-210b-18f9-cb0699493acd@rik.users.panix.com>

On 10/26/2022 1:52 AM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
> The following example produces different results when processed by LMTX 
> and MkIV. In particular, a space between the X and Y is not 
> auto-inserted by LMTX, while it is by MkIV.
> 
>     \starttexdefinition TEST #1
>        #1\autoinsertnextspace
>     \stoptexdefinition
>     \tt
>     \starttext
>        \TEST{X} \emph{Y}
>     \stoptext
> 
> The MkIV result is the correct result (in my opinion).
more a side effect ... we lookahead and \emph is not some character

I made a variants that does abetter job on that

\starttexdefinition TEST #1
     #1%
     \autoinsertedspace % subtle name change
\stoptexdefinition

but you have to wait till we update,

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : https://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-25 23:52 Rik Kabel via ntg-context
2022-10-26 11:43 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context [this message]
2022-10-26 13:35   ` Rik Kabel via ntg-context
2022-10-27  7:54     ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ca8ed7b-102d-8bf5-a57d-08cc00b46687@freedom.nl \
    --to=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    --cc=j.hagen@freedom.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).