From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4013 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marc van Dongen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: texexec Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:23:06 +0000 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <20010211082306.D13263@cs.ucc.ie> References: <000d01c093b0$4985b340$a3ccfea9@nuovo> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394709 22061 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:38:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ConTeXt Original-To: Giuseppe Bilotta In-Reply-To: <000d01c093b0$4985b340$a3ccfea9@nuovo>; from oblomov@freemail.it on Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 08:02:09PM +0100 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4013 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4013 Giuseppe Bilotta (oblomov@freemail.it) wrote: : I'm getting so used to ConTeXt that I sometime : run texexec on my LaTeX documents. So I found : that it would be nice if texexec had (possibly : limited) support for non-ConTeXt format, especially : plain and LaTeX. : : I could then link .tex files to texexec without worries. Why not define your own shell script or batch command which does this simple preprocessing, get used to use the new command and leave textexec as it is? Regards, Marc -- Marc van Dongen, CS Dept | phone: +353 21 4903578 University College Cork, NUIC | Fax: +353 21 4903113 College Road, Cork, Ireland | Email: dongen@cs.ucc.ie