From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4068 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Han The Thanh Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: no tif? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:41:00 +0100 (MET) Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <200102141441.PAA26858@anxur.fi.muni.cz> References: <25DB90CB4178D4118AB300D0B72E7D030FC03F@MSGMARBIO05> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394760 22583 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:39:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:39:20 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <25DB90CB4178D4118AB300D0B72E7D030FC03F@MSGMARBIO05> from "White, George" at "Feb 14, 1 10:03:26 am" Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl (ConTeXt List) Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4068 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4068 tif support is included implicitly from version 0.14f, as I wish to make the life of the maintainers easier (in the first place Fabrice). But I have to admit that I am not entirely happy with my decision to support tif. Thanh