From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/5450 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Lumos Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Environments, Projects, Products, Components Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:54:50 -0700 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <200108301755.ANJ52952@100m.mpr200-1.esr.lvcm.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396043 1716 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:00:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: Message from Hans Hagen of "Thu, 31 May 2001 11:34:58 +0200." <3.0.6.32.20010531113458.012f0330@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:5450 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:5450 Hans Hagen : >At 09:51 AM 5/31/01 +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote: >>Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >>> >>> Wednesday, May 30, 2001 Taco Hoekwater wrote: >>> >>> I see. Hadn't thought of that ... which do you think is the better >>> idea? taking \product off is space-saving (only one file per >>> chapter, instead of two wrappers plus the file), but somehow seems >>> less structuring ... maybe I'd better keep \product in until I >>> need to use the same file somewhere else ... >>> >>> What happens if product booka meets a component that says \product >>> bookb? >> >>If I understand correctly, nothing. I *think* \product is in there >>to allow partial compile of the component. But I not sure and > >you got it right! > >Hans Is there a complete example anywhere that uses partial compilation? I couldn't get it working before and just assumed that I'd misunderstood what it was for. Steve