From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/5649 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Johannes Huesing Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Flowchart again: How is font size calculated Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:03:37 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <20010916110337.A401@ruhrau.de> References: <20010915210631.A1000@ruhrau.de> <01091522014400.10075@levana> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396228 3433 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:03:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <01091522014400.10075@levana>; from pg@levana.de on Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:01:44PM +0200 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:5649 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:5649 On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Patrick Gundlach wrote: > changing nx=5 to nx=4 in the second chart, the sizes seem to be the same in > the three charts. But I don't know it this really solves your problem. I'd > guess that it has to do something with scaling down. Yes, it looks like it. The maxwidth key seems to act a bit like the width option in \externalfigure. It looks as if it is best to define width and height wrt the font size and maxwidth and maxheight wrt the text size. Greetings Johannes -- Johannes Hüsing | Terrorism treats the ending of a hannes@ruhrau.de | state as damage, and routes around it