From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6644 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jens-Uwe Morawski Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Setting up lbr fonts Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:56:32 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <20020124115632.520f04b4.morawski@gmx.net> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020122132800.032ff078@server-1> <20020122114515.900@oxmail.ox.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.1.20020122132800.032ff078@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20020123093117.033d0c00@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397160 12427 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:19:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ConTeXt In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20020123093117.033d0c00@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6644 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6644 On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 09:54:07 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > Say that you have this palatino and that you used fontinst to generate ec > encoded fonts, then you have to make a script like: First, thank you for your explanations. > \starttypescript [serif] [adobepalatino] [ec] > > \definefontsynonym [Palatino] [thefontinstgeneratedname] > \definefontsynonym [PalatinoBold] [anotherfontinstgeneratedname] > > \stoptypescript Okay, that's the part i understand But, > It's a serif font, so now we define an accompanying serif script: > > \starttypescript [serif] [adobepalatino] [name] > > \definefontsynonym [Serif] [Palatino] > \definefontsynonym [SerifBold] [PalatinoBold] > > \stoptypescript > What means/does [name] here? When i declare a [serif] typescript, why i need: \definefontsynonym [Serif] [Palatino] In my opinion this is redundant. \definefontsynonym [Regular] [Palatino] is what i would use. Of course i can map Serif-->Regular in an other [serif] typescript, but i think that would break another [sans] typescript with the same mapping. Or the same question from another point of view: When the font-commands use or look for Serif, SerifBold ... why the typescript must be declared as [serif]? or what would mean a [sans] typescript with the same \definefontsynonym [Serif...] [...] definitions? > The next thing is using this font. Of course you can execute typescripts > yourself but best is to use the command > > \definetypeface [myface] [rm] [serif] [adobepalatino] [default] [encoding=ec] Here again. As far as i understand the font-switching-macros use the declarations like Serif, or SerifBold. In this case: why i have to declared it as [rm] too? Or, why i need 'rm' in the next declaration? 'myface' is already defined as 'rm' > > \setupbodyfont[myface,10pt,rm] > Hmm, many questions, which show that i understand nothing ;) And another question: fontinst generates some fonts including symbols like degree. upright-mu or the registered-symbol. These are in (LaTeX) TS1 encoding. What declarations are needed to use them? Thanks in advance. Regards, Jens