From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/7049 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marko Schuetz Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: [Fwd: Bug tracking system for ConTeXt] Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 01:33:24 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <20020227013324L.marko@kinetic.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> References: <3C7B84A5.CADA9330@gmx.de> Reply-To: MarkoSchuetz@web.de NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397544 16061 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:25:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: burnus@gmx.de In-Reply-To: <3C7B84A5.CADA9330@gmx.de> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:7049 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:7049 Tobias, From: Tobias Burnus Subject: [Fwd: Bug tracking system for ConTeXt] Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:50:45 +0100 [..] > I installed a bug tracking system (Bugzilla) for ConTeXt and PPCHTeX on > http://bugzilla.physik.fu-berlin.de:8080/context/ > > This location may move in the future (for instance to Hans server), all > data is saved in a separate database (besides "our" bugzilla at > http://bugzilla.physik.fu-berlin.de:8080/bugzilla/) and daily backuped. > The server is presently a Debian Woody Athlon 800 MHz with (only) 128 MB > Ram. > > Hans asked me to stress that he wants to spend more time on coding than > on managing bug reports: > > now, we need to establish a strategy, like, only serious bugs are reported, > > otherwise we end up in spending our lives doing admin work; also, with > > regards to bugs in manuals, i favor 'collected bugs', not one entry per > > type -) have you considered using Peter Miller's Aegis? Currently it seems that many of the ConTeXt users would be capable of rephrasing their bug report as a test for desired functionality. So this would open a new way to contribute: by writing tests... >>From personal experience I can attest that Aegis is a great tool to steer software development... By default(!) - changes are accompanied by tests - these tests need to fail on the current version and succeed on the changed version - the changes are part of the source code of the project - a change is only added to the baseline if it passes all its tests - the result is that the baseline will always satisfy all its tests Eine schöne Zeit Marko Schütz