From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/7438
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Michael Wiedmann <mw@miwie.in-berlin.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: XML Processing Instructions
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:28:55 +0100
Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl
Message-ID: <20020323132855.GA2032@miwie.in-berlin.de>
References: <20020318201136.GA7141@miwie.in-berlin.de> <20020321203641.F375@scaprea>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035397901 19246 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:31:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:31:41 +0000 (UTC)
Original-To: NTG ConTeXt <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20020321203641.F375@scaprea>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:7438
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:7438

* Simon Pepping <spepping@scaprea.hobby.nl> [020321 20:36]:
... 
> \defineXMLprocessor[some-pi] \dosomepi
> \def\dosomepi#1{(Some PI: #1)}
... 
> That is because context expects a form like <?pi-name pi-data?>. The
> data are inserted as a single token after the defined XML processor,
> and thus can be picked up by it as an argument. If no processor is
> defined, the data is ignored.

Thanks Simon, it works like you pointed out, *but*:

in contrary e.g. to the handling of PIs in DocBook DSSSL styleheets
*and* against my understanding of the definition for PIs, ConTeXt forces
to use a 'data' field in PIs (like <?line-break true?>) though
<?line-break?> alone should be sufficient. ConText stops processing the
current element content in the last case.

Or do I still miss something.

Michael
-- 
mw@miwie.in-berlin.de                              http://www.miwie.org
mw@miwie.org