From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8114 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Petrou Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Q: problems finding syst-pln.tex Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:45:48 -0400 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <20020603134548.B27369@cs.cmu.edu> References: <20020602235317.L15701@cs.cmu.edu> <20020603074309.D393-100000@prudence.compuserve.de> Reply-To: dpetrou@ece.cmu.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398547 24868 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:42:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@let.uu.nl Original-To: Andreas Fritsch In-Reply-To: <20020603074309.D393-100000@prudence.compuserve.de>; from fritsch_andreas@gmx.de on Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:44:20AM +0200 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8114 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8114 > did you update your lsr? > > 'texconfig rehash' > > should do the trick. That works! Thanks! I think the documenation should be updated to mention that this should be run. Do the developers of ConTeXt read this mailing list? If not, who should I contact to suggest this? Now, I have another problem. When I try to do `texexec --make metafun' I get this: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- bash-2.04# texexec --make metafun TeXExec 2.8 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2002 This is MetaPost, Version 0.641 (Web2C 7.3.1) (INIMP) ! I can't find file `metafun'. <*> metafun Please type another input file name: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The only file that I have that looks like `metafun' is `metapost/context/metafun.mp'. What am I doing wrong? Finally, could you answer whether I should have run `fmtutil --all'? The documentation is kind of unclear in this section. The documentation mentions this command, but not whether or not the user should run it. And it's a very time-consuming process. Finally, it seems like `texexec --make' replicates some of what `fmtutil --all' does. > Andreas thanks, david