From: David Antos <xantos@informatics.muni.cz>
Cc: NTG ConTeXt Mailing List <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Q: problems finding syst-pln.tex
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 12:56:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020604125620.A32564112@aisa.fi.muni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020603134548.B27369@cs.cmu.edu>; from dpetrou@ece.cmu.edu on Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:45:48PM -0400
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:45:48PM -0400, David Petrou wrote:
> > did you update your lsr?
> >
> > 'texconfig rehash'
> >
> > should do the trick.
>
> That works! Thanks!
>
> I think the documenation should be updated to mention that this should
> be run. Do the developers of ConTeXt read this mailing list? If not,
> who should I contact to suggest this?
Hello,
I always push Hans to improve the documentation, nevertheless this
is a problem of kpathsea library and its manual. I'm also sure all the
ConTeXt developers read this list, so writing here is a suggestion:-).
Just read your (I guess) TeXlive documentation about finding files.
> Now, I have another problem. When I try to do `texexec --make
> metafun' I get this:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> bash-2.04# texexec --make metafun
>
> TeXExec 2.8 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2002
>
> This is MetaPost, Version 0.641 (Web2C 7.3.1) (INIMP)
> ! I can't find file `metafun'.
> <*> metafun
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The only file that I have that looks like `metafun' is
> `metapost/context/metafun.mp'. What am I doing wrong?
I think it's just the same problem. Do you have also about 15 mp-????.mp
files in the directory? Does kpsewhich find them? (Run kpsewhich
<name>.)
> Finally, could you answer whether I should have run `fmtutil --all'?
This command rebuilds all format files you have configured in
fmtutil.cnf. There is no need to rebuild e.g., plain or LaTeX, when you
updated just ConTeXt installation. When you install a new ConTeXt,
rebuild the ConTeXt formats cont-??.fmt or .efmt, an easy way is to
delete them and to say fmtutil --missing. texexec --make would do the
same. On the other hand, texexec is able to include custom
configurations, you must use the --alone switch to make it ignore the
fmtutil.cnf settings. The texexec script is also useful on systems that
have no own format utility. I was also confused in the beginning :-)
D.A.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-04 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 3:53 David Petrou
2002-06-03 5:44 ` Andreas Fritsch
2002-06-03 17:45 ` David Petrou
2002-06-04 10:56 ` David Antos [this message]
2002-06-10 16:13 ` David Petrou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020604125620.A32564112@aisa.fi.muni.cz \
--to=xantos@informatics.muni.cz \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).