From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8215 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Culleton Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Context to XML Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 19:23:00 -0400 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <200206091923.00924.john@wexfordpress.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398635 25571 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:43:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8215 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8215 I understand that Pragma is working on the job of making XML coded documents work under Context. However XML does not have ways of showing refinements such as hanging punctuation etc. AFAIK. So I have two questions: Is there a reverse path from Context to XML encoding? Is the loss of detail in this reverse path so great so as to make the use of fine typesetting useless? There are databases of published documents that require conversion to XML, hence my questions. -- John Culleton Able Indexers and Typesetters http://wexfordpress.com __________________________________________________ D O T E A S Y - "Join the web hosting revolution!" http://www.doteasy.com