From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8399 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Idris S Hamid Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Bug in TeX mode! Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 07:22:51 -0600 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <200206240722.51111.ishamid@attbi.com> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20020623131151.0341eac0@server-1> <5.1.0.14.1.20020624104126.0340baa8@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035398805 27224 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:46:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "ConTeXt Mailing List" Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20020624104126.0340baa8@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8399 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8399 On Monday 24 June 2002 02:41, Hans Hagen wrote: > At 03:54 PM 6/23/2002 -0600, Idris S Hamid wrote: > > > >the default format gives the correct results (\bfc) but > > > > > > > >--tex=tex and --tex=omega > > > > > > > >do not execute the size changing commands. [snip] > can you test tex versus etex ? I did that; --tex=tex does not behave properly. It gives the same problems as --tex=omega. Idris -- Dr. Idris S Hamid Department of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80526