From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8849 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Culleton Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: pdf(e)tex version. Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 09:50:18 -0400 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <200207280950.18203.john@wexfordpress.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035399223 30968 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:53:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8849 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8849 Thanh is too clever for me. First of all I read somewhere that we should all be using pdfetex instead of pdftex. True? Second I tried pdftex --version and pdfetex --version. Here are the results: pdfTeX (Web2C 7.3.3.1) 3.14159-pre-1.0-unofficial-20010704 kpathsea version 3.3.3.1 pdfeTeX (Web2C 7.3.3.1) 3.14159-0.14h-released-20010417-2.1 kpathsea version 3.3.3.1 JUst ot confuse matters texexec seems to mix these two: This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-pre-1.0-unofficial-20010704-2.1 (Web2C 7.3.3.1) 1. Are these current enough? 2. Assuming pdfetex is it, where is the best site for getting the best stable version? John Culleton John Culleton