From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/8980 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Devereux Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Context -> html Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:31:19 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <20020812153119.GC26595@cordelia> References: <20020812075643.GB26595@cordelia> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035399344 32132 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:55:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:8980 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:8980 * David Somers (dsomers@trevezel.com) wrote: > > I hate to say this, but "Me too!". I would really appreciate the ability for > Context to be used to generate HTML docs... and like John I've a bunch of > documents to convert. (My "evil-twin" has just appeared and said: if you can > squeeze HTML out of Context, why not go the whole hog and produce HTML that > can then be put through the MS HTML Help compiler... that way, you can use > ConTeXt for PDF, HTML, and HTMLHelp production!) Now there's a thought....I had not considered help file generation, but that is also something we have to do. So is xml the answer? It seems so ugly and verbose, but perhaps I should investigate it. -- John