From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9676 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Adam T. Lindsay" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: MP Graph and texnum.mpx Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:59:19 +0000 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <20021028155919.8011@news.comp.lancs.ac.uk> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021028133336.030ff5e0@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035820757 21233 80.91.224.249 (28 Oct 2002 15:59:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ConTeXt Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 186CIN-0005WK-00 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:59:15 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E070510AE7; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:00:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from news.comp.lancs.ac.uk (news.comp.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.152.70]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAFE10AE5 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:59:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from [148.88.155.173] (egc034000003.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.155.173]) by news.comp.lancs.ac.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g9SFxLa17655; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:59:21 GMT Original-To: "Hans Hagen" In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20021028133336.030ff5e0@server-1> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 4.0.1 carbon Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9676 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9676 Hi Hans. Hans Hagen said this at Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:35:33 +0100: >>Some system details: I'm running a fresh TeXLive 7 install, with the >>latest ConTeXt from the website. I have \write18 enabled, >>\runMPfraphicstrue, \runMPTEXgraphicstrue, and MPXCOMMAND = texexec -- >>mptex. On the slightly unusual side, I have \forceMPTEXgraphictrue, which >>seemed necessary at one point, and no \recycleMPslotstrue, which seemed >>unnecessary. > >get the latest version from out site, and load graph module: > >\usemodule[graph] > >This will provide you with integration of the graph package (with a few >advantages, like properly typeset labels and so); Oh, sorry I wasn't clear about this. I've been using the cont-tmf from 2002.10.11. m-graph.tex from that version is the same version as what currently up there (2002.10.23) . I have indeed been using \usemodule[graph], and getting generally good results once texnum.mpx is around. I'd call it a very repeatable bug (installation issue?). When there is no texexec.mpx in the current directory: no MP graphs; if there is: fairly nice results. The labels are correctly typeset, but the axis numbers are not (the cmr problem below). If you're saying that it should be taken care of, then there's probably something wrong with my installation that's not dynamically generating texnum.mpx when it's supposed to. >As a side question, would I have to fiddle with texmf/metapost/base/ >>texnum.mp to affect the font of the x- and y-axis numbers on an MPGraph >>plot? They seem to stick to CMR no matter what I do to defaultfont in >>MetaPost. > >no, texnum cum suis are actulay spoiling the game, but it should work ok now Hmm. Seeing as everything that relies on m-graph is working fine, I'm more convinced it's in the on-the-fly generation of mpx files. I had problems with it with MPXCOMMAND as both makempx and texexec. Many thanks, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537 Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-