From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9709 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jens-Uwe Morawski Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Fwd: Strange error... Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:26:00 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <20021104102600.44fc18f9.morawski@gmx.net> References: <5.1.0.14.1.20021102213239.035c7ff8@remote-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036402080 2992 80.91.224.249 (4 Nov 2002 09:28:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188dWZ-0000m8-00 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 10:27:59 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FC410AE7; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:29:23 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (sproxy.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 78E2110AE6 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:28:02 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 10614 invoked by uid 0); 4 Nov 2002 09:28:01 -0000 Original-Received: from port1179.fra.ginko.net (HELO melior.localdomain) (212.202.66.163) by mail.gmx.net (mp015-rz3) with SMTP; 4 Nov 2002 09:28:01 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.1.20021102213239.035c7ff8@remote-1> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9709 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9709 On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 21:33:17 +0100 Hans Hagen wrote: > >Do you have an idea what is wrong? > > > >... > >systems : end file cenj at line 244 > >! pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier > >(name{page:15}) h > >as been already used, duplicate ignored > > fit > > > > > > \egroup > >\fakePDFpagedestination ...e:\realfolio }}\egroup > > \fi \fi \fi > >\actualshipout ...chbox \hbox {\the \everyshipout > > \ifnum \realpageno > >=\lastp... > > > >\myshipout ...pout {\thisisrealpage \realfolio #1} > > \fi \gotonextrealpage > >\nap... > > > >\dofinaloutput ...pagebody #1#2\setpagecounters }} > > \fi \the > >\everyaftershipou... > >... > >l.244 \stoptext > this is pdftex's way of telling you that you have a duplicate reference After the update to version 2002-10-23 i get the same error. I'm sure that it was not there using the previous ConTeXt version. Here the message is: ! pdfTeX warning (ext4): destination with the same identifier (name{page:16}) h as been already used, duplicate ignored fit \egroup \fakePDFpagedestination ...e:\realfolio }}\egroup \fi \fi \fi \actualshipout ...chbox \hbox {\the \everyshipout \ifnum \realpageno =\lastp... \myshipout ...pout {\thisisrealpage \realfolio #1} \fi \gotonextrealpage \nap... \dofinaloutput ...pagebody #1#2\setpagecounters }} \fi \the \everyaftershipou... ... l.40 \stopproduct [17.17] ) Are you sure that this is not a bug in ConTeXt? I normally do not label destinations/references as "name{page:16}". Jens