From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9716 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jens-Uwe Morawski Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: MP Graph - Berry problems 23/10/2002 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:32:36 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <20021104213236.6aa4dcc2.morawski@gmx.net> References: <20021104150000.34c52dc3.morawski@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036442279 28612 80.91.224.249 (4 Nov 2002 20:37:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188nyu-0007R0-00 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:37:56 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2566C10AE9; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:39:21 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (sproxy.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C05A10AE8 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:38:22 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 16719 invoked by uid 0); 4 Nov 2002 20:38:12 -0000 Original-Received: from port1661.fra.ginko.net (HELO melior.localdomain) (212.202.68.137) by mail.gmx.net (mp020-rz3) with SMTP; 4 Nov 2002 20:38:12 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9716 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9716 On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 15:34:45 +0000 Nigel King wrote: > I mistakenly thought > that I was expecting 8a on the end for ec encoding. I do have ec-utmr8a.tfm > manufactured by texfont by type-tmf.dat dated 11/9/01 even thought the > overall context is 23/10/02. 8a means the original encoding of the AFMs. texfont takes this basename and precedes this with a ec- for a T1 (ec) encoded font. This is the ConTeXt/texfont naming scheme. If you stick to the Berry naming scheme then this font will be 8t in T1 encoding, 7t in OT1 and there are some more, see fontinst.[dvi|ps|pdf] on CTAN. Normally the T1 encoded fonts are already on your system due to the LaTeX PSNFSS (PostScript New Font Selection Scheme) has already installed it. Thus you don't need to install them again using texfont, the only thing to do is to tell ConTeXt that the Berry fontnames have to be used. This is exactly what \usetypescript[berry][ec] does. Jens