From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/9757 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jens-Uwe Morawski Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Is your ConTeXt too slow? Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:36:44 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl Message-ID: <20021107213644.245e2e11.morawski@gmx.net> Reply-To: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036701888 22573 80.91.224.249 (7 Nov 2002 20:44:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 189tSx-0005ZX-00 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 21:41:27 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C21010B28; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:42:57 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 38E9B10AF5 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:40:16 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 24501 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2002 20:40:11 -0000 Original-Received: from port1413.fra.ginko.net (HELO melior.localdomain) (212.202.67.143) by mail.gmx.net (mp012-rz3) with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 20:40:11 -0000 Original-To: ConTeXt X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ref.ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:9757 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:9757 Hi all (or mainly the users of Unix-like systems) after i've bought a new notebook and installed the recent Redhat Linux system i found that an updated ConTeXt runs very slow. First i thought that Hans had too much time and implemented a few thousand new features that need their time, but ... ... it is a queerer story. Here are the run times of an example document (many inline MP graphics, 18 pages, many terminal messages !!) on different terminal programs for X-Windows: gnome-terminal: 2 min 18 sec konsole (KDE-terminal): 1 min 30 sec xterm: 1 min 5 sec directly on the console (no X-Windows): 58 sec Normally i use the first. Hmm... ;-( Don't ask me for reasons, but if your ConTeXt is too slow, ask yourself if you run it on the right terminal -) Jens