ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hlavacek <jhlavacek@sf.edu>
Subject: Re: Is your ConTeXt too slow?
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:28:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021108132814.GD9042@math.sf.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021108110348.197b49c5.morawski@gmx.net>

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:03:48AM +0100, Jens-Uwe Morawski wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:30:56 +0100
> Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
> 
> > At 09:36 PM 11/7/2002 +0100, Jens-Uwe Morawski wrote:
> > 
> > >Hi all (or mainly the users of Unix-like systems)
> > >
> > >after i've bought a new notebook and installed the recent
> > >Redhat Linux system i found that an updated ConTeXt runs
> > >very slow. First i thought that Hans had too much time
> > >and implemented a few thousand new features that need
> > >their time, but ...
> > >
> > >... it is a queerer story. Here are the run times of
> > >an example document (many inline MP graphics, 18 pages,
> > >many terminal messages !!) on different terminal programs
> > >for X-Windows:
> > >
> > >gnome-terminal:         2 min 18 sec
> > >konsole (KDE-terminal): 1 min 30 sec
> > >xterm:                  1 min  5 sec
> > >directly on the console
> > >         (no X-Windows):       58 sec
> > >
> > >Normally i use the first. Hmm... ;-(
> > >
> > >Don't ask me for reasons, but if your ConTeXt is too
> > >slow, ask yourself if you run it on the right terminal -)
> > 
> > Can you check if kpsewhich runs ok? For instance
> > 
> >    kpsewhich colo-ini.tex
> > 
> >    kpsewhich cmr10.tfm
> > 
> > maybe no ls-R file is found and consulted, resulting in a full scan of the 
> > texmf file structure.
> 
> No, no. TeX finds its files very fast. I could improve that with a smaller
> texmf-tree, but 1+ min for the job is IMO okay; it runs 3xConTeXt,
> 2xTeXUtil and 2xMetaPost. The problem is the terminal program. It seems
> that the drawing of those many messages on the terminal needs much time.
> If i use a slow terminal, i.e. gnome-terminal, then the runtime increases.
> 
> Can i switch off the messages generated by ConTeXt, this would help to
> compare.


Did you try to run context with output redirected to a file?  How long
does that take? 

try texexec yourfile.tex > logfile

then look at the file called logfile to see the messages.

-- 
Jan Hlavacek                                            (219) 434-7566
Department of Mathematics                             Jhlavacek@sf.edu
University of Saint Francis               http://www.sf.edu/jhlavacek/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-08 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-07 20:36 Jens-Uwe Morawski
2002-11-08  8:30 ` Hans Hagen
2002-11-08 10:03   ` Jens-Uwe Morawski
2002-11-08 13:28     ` Jan Hlavacek [this message]
2002-11-08 15:51       ` Jens-Uwe Morawski
2002-11-08 16:01         ` Hans Hagen
2002-11-09 10:28           ` Henning Hraban Ramm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021108132814.GD9042@math.sf.edu \
    --to=jhlavacek@sf.edu \
    --cc=ntg-context@ref.ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).