From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/10102
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Siep <siep@elvenkind.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context
Subject: Re: lucida
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:04:16 +0100
Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
Message-ID: <20021211100416.36a6a864.siep@elvenkind.com>
References: <20021210154650.6d52b46c.siep@elvenkind.com>
	<000501c2a05f$df0a0bb0$0200a8c0@home>
	<20021210164618.6aca084c.siep@elvenkind.com>
	<20021210160347.GA15526@bastiat.econ.duke.edu>
	<001f01c2a0b1$d47ecad0$0200a8c0@home>
Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039597612 9973 80.91.224.249 (11 Dec 2002 09:06:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:06:52 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl>
Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl)
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18M2pO-0002a1-00
	for <gctc-ntg-context-518@gmane.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:06:50 +0100
Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6302110AEA; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:06:14 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from glenfiddich.elvenkind.com (elvenknd.xs4all.nl [213.84.171.68])
	by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E295A10AE7
	for <ntg-context@ntg.nl>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:04:36 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: from oban (oban.elvenkind.com [10.10.0.20])
	by glenfiddich.elvenkind.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id B6ED4A4A3; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:55:40 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
In-Reply-To: <001f01c2a0b1$d47ecad0$0200a8c0@home>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl
X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
X-Reply-To: siep@elvenkind.com
List-Help: <mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context.ntg.nl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>,
	<mailto:ntg-context-request@ntg.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:10102
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:10102

Now I got the file showfont.pdf. I copied the example, but I still
got a texnansi-lbr missing font. \setupbodyfont didn't work either.

A LaTeX file with \usepackage{lucidabr} and either with or without
\usepackage{texnansi} works perfectly.

What assumptions are being made about the way the fonts are
installed? I have been testing on what is basically a stock tetex
with lb... pfb's added and with a context from August, and on a stock
miktex also with with lb... pfb's added.

For another project, we have successfully used our own font-....tex
files, which don't use the typescript mechanism, but now I need a
simple `canonical' solution for a general-purpose (MiK)TeX
installation.

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:08:35 +0900
"Matthew Huggett" <mhuggett@zam.att.ne.jp> wrote:

> Yeah, don't forget to do \setupbodyfont
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Daniel Graham" <daniel.graham@duke.edu>
> To: <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 1:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] lucida
> 
> 
> > This works for me:
> > 
> > \setupbodyfont[lbr]
> > 
> > -Dan

-- 
Siep Kroonenberg
siep@elvenkind.com