From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/11218 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jens-Uwe Morawski Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Problems recompiling LaTeX2ConTeXt.tex Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 00:03:54 +0100 Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: <20030306000354.16d88e9a.morawski@gmx.net> References: <20030304164524.36756.qmail@web10706.mail.yahoo.com> <20030305202503.GA1673@scaprea> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046908375 19213 80.91.224.249 (5 Mar 2003 23:52:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Thu Mar 06 00:52:54 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18qigE-0004xx-00 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 00:52:10 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B9C10B64; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 00:52:38 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A60D10B61 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 00:50:20 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 29702 invoked by uid 0); 5 Mar 2003 23:50:19 -0000 Original-Received: from port1189.fra.ginko.net (HELO melior.localdomain) (212.202.66.173) by mail.gmx.net (mp016-rz3) with SMTP; 5 Mar 2003 23:50:19 -0000 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <20030305202503.GA1673@scaprea> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:11218 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:11218 On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 21:25:04 +0100 Simon Pepping wrote: > I think running Red Hat 8.0, with teTeX-1.0.7 with ConTeXt ver: > 2002.1.28 is a reasonable thing to do. Most of the software packages I > run are older than that. One only runs the latest and greatest of > software one is especially interested in. Hmm, aren't you interested in ConTeXt? ;-) The real question: would you like that people ask/bother you about bugs and missing features of DocBookInConTeXt that are already fixed or implemented. I'm sure your answer is: No. So, why use an old ConTeXt if Hans spends so much time to improve it. Why use an old and buggy pdftex that is shipped with RedHat's teTeX? Why use a TeX system that does not support real (no ae tricks) 8-bit (T1) ComputerModern fonts ? I see no reason. jm2c Jens