Bug in Enumerations

Bug in Enumerations

[Slawek Zak]

There is a bug in enumerations' implementation. The following example
is nearly literally taken from english ConTeXt manual 
(cont-eni.pdf, p. 224)

See this example:

  \defineenumeration[step]   [location=left,text={},width=2em]
  \setupenumerations[step]   [headstyle=bold]
  \setupenumerations[substep][headstyle=slanted]

  \starttext
	  \step    One \par
	  \substep Two \par
  \stoptext

The headstyle for substep is bold, just like for step, and not slanted
as stated in the manual.

Help, please :)

/S

PS: Hans, are there any chances to get the new beta with backgrounds'
recalculation bug fixed? Latest beta is from before BachoTeX ;)

Re: Bug in Enumerations

[Giuseppe Bilotta]

Wednesday, May 28, 2003 Slawek Zak wrote:

SZ> There is a bug in enumerations' implementation. The following example
SZ> is nearly literally taken from english ConTeXt manual 
SZ> (cont-eni.pdf, p. 224)

SZ> See this example:

SZ>   \defineenumeration[step]  
SZ> [location=left,text={},width=2em]
SZ>   \setupenumerations[step]   [headstyle=bold]
SZ>   \setupenumerations[substep][headstyle=slanted]

SZ>   \starttext
SZ>           \step    One \par
SZ>           \substep Two \par
SZ>   \stoptext

SZ> The headstyle for substep is bold, just like for step, and not slanted
SZ> as stated in the manual.

As a temporary patch, put the following in your cont-loc and
tell me how it works out. If you don't have a cont-loc, put it
in your cont-new.

===============================================================================
\def\special@@definitiewoord#1#2#3#4[#5]#6#7%
  {\strut
   \doifelsevalue{\??dd#1\c!nummer}\v!nee
     \!!doneafalse
     {\doifelse{#5}{-}
        \!!doneafalse
        \!!doneatrue}%
   \chardef\definitiekoppeling\zerocount
   \iflocation
     \doifvaluesomething{\??dd#1\c!koppeling}
       {\processaction % genereert > of <
          [\getvalue{\??dd#1\c!koppelwijze}]
          [ \v!lokaal=>\chardef\definitiekoppeling1, % old: default
           \v!globaal=>\chardef\definitiekoppeling2]}% new: global crosslinking
   \fi
   \stelnummerin % the number is called indirectly
     [\getvalue{\??dd#1\??dd\c!nummer}]
     [\c!sectienummer=\getvalue{\??dd#1\c!sectienummer}]%
   \if!!donea
     \getvalue{\e!volgende#2#1}%
     \iflocation
       \bgroup
       \letvalue{\??dd#1\c!sectienummer}\v!ja
       \protectconversion
       \maakvoorafgaandenummer[\getvalue{\??dd#1\??dd\c!nummer}]%
       \preparethenumber{\??dd#1}\voorafgaandenummer\preparednumber
       \ifcase\definitiekoppeling \or
         \xdef\internaldoornummer{#3{#1}}%
         \rawreference\s!num{#1:\internaldoornummer}{}%
       \or
         \xdef\internaldoornummer{\countervalue{\??dd\c!koppeling#1}}%
         \rawreference\s!num{#1:\internaldoornummer}{}%
       \fi
       \egroup
     \fi
     \maakvoorafgaandenummer[\getvalue{\??dd#1\??dd\c!nummer}]%
     \preparethenumber{\??dd#1}\voorafgaandenummer\preparednumber
     \hbox
       {\let\normalkap\relax % sorry, uppercase causes troubles
        \doattributes        % \nocase primitive needed
          {\??dd#2#1}\c!kopletter\c!kopkleur
          {\getvalue{\??dd#1\c!commando}% hook for taco 
             {\showdntext{#2#1}%
              \domakednnummer{#1}{#2}{#3}}}%
        \iflocation\ifcase\definitiekoppeling \else
          \edef\localconnection{\getvalue{\??dd#1\c!koppeling}:\internaldoornummer}%
          \doifreferencefoundelse\localconnection
            {\in[\localconnection]}{}% genereert > of <
        \fi\fi}%
     \doifnot{#5}{-}{\rawreference\s!num{#5}{#3{#1}}}%
   \else % Why was this strange expansion needed? 
     \hbox
       {\edef\!!stringa{\showdnpuretext{#2#1}}% nog eens testen binnen \expanded
        \expanded{\doattributes{\??dd#1}\noexpand\c!kopletter\noexpand\c!kopkleur
          {\noexpand\getvalue{\??dd#1\c!commando}{\!!stringa}}}%
        \doifnot{#5}{-}{\rawreference\s!num{#5}{}}}%
   \fi}
===============================================================================
FOR HANS: I added a #2 in the \doattributes for kopletter and
kopkleur.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta

Re: Bug in Enumerations

[Hans Hagen]

At 19:02 28/05/2003 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

>As a temporary patch, put the following in your cont-loc and
>tell me how it works out. If you don't have a cont-loc, put it
>in your cont-new.

>        \doattributes        % \nocase primitive needed
>           {\??dd#2#1}\c!kopletter\c!kopkleur
>===============================================================================
>FOR HANS: I added a #2 in the \doattributes for kopletter and
>kopkleur.

ah, cleverly deduced, must be some quite old bug btw, probably introduced 
when \doattributes was extended; thanks

Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
                       Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
                     documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Bug in Enumerations

[Slawek Zak]

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:02:00PM +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> SZ> There is a bug in enumerations' implementation. The following example
> SZ> is nearly literally taken from english ConTeXt manual 
> SZ> (cont-eni.pdf, p. 224)

[...]

> As a temporary patch, put the following in your cont-loc and
> tell me how it works out. If you don't have a cont-loc, put it
> in your cont-new.

I made my cont-loc, put your patch there and rebuilt the format. Yes -
the cont-loc is loaded as I put a little \message at the beginning of
this file, but no visible change in compiled document is present :(

Thanks, /S

Re: Bug in Enumerations

[Hans Hagen]

At 11:05 29/05/2003 +0200, Slawek Zak wrote:
>On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:02:00PM +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> > SZ> There is a bug in enumerations' implementation. The following example
> > SZ> is nearly literally taken from english ConTeXt manual
> > SZ> (cont-eni.pdf, p. 224)
>
>[...]
>
> > As a temporary patch, put the following in your cont-loc and
> > tell me how it works out. If you don't have a cont-loc, put it
> > in your cont-new.
>
>I made my cont-loc, put your patch there and rebuilt the format. Yes -
>the cont-loc is loaded as I put a little \message at the beginning of
>this file, but no visible change in compiled document is present :(

if you are willing to recompile ... then just patch core-des.tex instead

Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | pragma@wxs.nl
                       Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
                     documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Bug in Enumerations

[Slawek Zak]

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:39:25AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >I made my cont-loc, put your patch there and rebuilt the format. Yes -
> >the cont-loc is loaded as I put a little \message at the beginning of
> >this file, but no visible change in compiled document is present :(
> 
> if you are willing to recompile ... then just patch core-des.tex instead

So much better. Thanks.

/S

Re: Bug in enumerations

[Hans Hagen]

At 06:28 PM 3/3/2000 +0100, Zeljko Vrba wrote:

>\defineenumeration[definition][location=serried,text=Definicija,way=bychapt
er]
>\definition
>Za {\bf prazan} skup vrijedi
>\placeformula\startformula
>\forall x\in {\cal X}\mu_\emptyset(x)=0
>\stopformula				<--- this is line 156
>Za {\bf univerzalan} skup vrijedi
>\placeformula\startformula
>\forall x\in {\cal X}\mu_{\cal X}(x)=1
>\stopformula
>\par

In that case try: 

\startdefinition

\stopdefinition

if it fails, let me know, because then I have to look into the details of a
core macro. 

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Bug in enumerations

[Zeljko Vrba]

Hi! I've tried to combine enumerations with formulas:

---
\defineenumeration[definition][location=serried,text=Definicija,way=bychapter]
\definition
Za {\bf prazan} skup vrijedi
\placeformula\startformula
\forall x\in {\cal X}\mu_\emptyset(x)=0
\stopformula				<--- this is line 156
Za {\bf univerzalan} skup vrijedi
\placeformula\startformula
\forall x\in {\cal X}\mu_{\cal X}(x)=1
\stopformula
\par
---

and I get the following error message:

This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159-14c (Web2C 7.3.1) (format=cont-hr 2000.1.2)  3 MAR 2000 18:19
**&/home/zeljko/cont-hr fuzzy
-- some material cut --
! Extra }, or forgotten \endgroup.
\par ->\egroup 
               \par \@@stopdefinitie {definition}\BeforePar {}\AfterPar {}
\par ->\egroup \par 
                    \@@stopdefinitie {definition}\BeforePar {}\AfterPar {}
\docomplexdoblanko ... \ifblankobuiten \else \par 
                                                  \ifvmode \ifblankoforceer ...

\complexdodoblanko ...ed {\docomplexdoblanko [#1]}
                                                  \fi 
\doifnumberelse ...donetrue \fi \ifdone \egroup #2
                                                  \else \egroup #3\fi 
\doifinstringelse ...{\@@@instring }{#2}#3\else #4
                                                  \fi 
...
l.156 \stopformula

-- I've marked the line in text which is line 156 in original document

? 
! Emergency stop.
\par ->\egroup 
               \par \@@stopdefinitie {definition}\BeforePar {}\AfterPar {}
\par ->\egroup \par 
                    \@@stopdefinitie {definition}\BeforePar {}\AfterPar {}
\docomplexdoblanko ... \ifblankobuiten \else \par 
                                                  \ifvmode \ifblankoforceer ...

\complexdodoblanko ...ed {\docomplexdoblanko [#1]}
                                                  \fi 
\doifnumberelse ...donetrue \fi \ifdone \egroup #2
                                                  \else \egroup #3\fi 
\doifinstringelse ...{\@@@instring }{#2}#3\else #4
                                                  \fi 
...
l.156 \stopformula

End of file on the terminal!

Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
 869 strings out of 32668
 14648 string characters out of 162758
 307573 words of memory out of 1100001
 21678 multiletter control sequences out of 10000+15000
 16078 words of font info for 51 fonts, out of 200000 for 1000
 14 hyphenation exceptions out of 1000
 65i,19n,97p,329b,1707s stack positions out of 1500i,500n,1500p,50000b,5000s
Output written on fuzzy.dvi (5 pages, 6804 bytes).