From: John Culleton <john@wexfordpress.com>
Subject: substitute for hangafter
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:44:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200309260844.08938.john@wexfordpress.com> (raw)
I have a classic \hangafter situation in a bibliography. However this TeX
primitive seems to be crippled in Context. What should I use instead?
--
John Culleton
Able Typesetters and Indexers
http://wexfordpress.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-26 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-26 12:44 John Culleton [this message]
2003-09-26 13:10 ` Patrick Gundlach
2003-09-26 19:30 ` Hans Hagen
2003-09-27 7:56 ` Patrick Gundlach
2003-09-27 10:19 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200309260844.08938.john@wexfordpress.com \
--to=john@wexfordpress.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).