From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/17114 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Adam Lindsay" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: does context support vietnamese? Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:45:17 +0000 Message-ID: <20041118014517.3394@news.comp.lancs.ac.uk> References: <20041118013604.GA695@monty> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100742347 18539 80.91.229.6 (18 Nov 2004 01:45:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users , Hans Hagen Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Nov 18 02:45:32 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CUbMa-0002h6-00 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:45:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2A0127D0; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:45:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30063-06; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:45:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2147127BF; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:45:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BA4127BF for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:45:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30038-06-2 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:45:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk (unknown [148.88.3.45]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26194127BD for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:45:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [192.168.31.100] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAI1jFqG015186; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:45:16 GMT Original-To: "The Thanh Han" In-Reply-To: <20041118013604.GA695@monty> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail version 5.0.1 build 4305 English X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:17114 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:17114 The Thanh Han said this at Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:36:05 +0700: >Hi Adam, > >ET5 was the first proposed font encoding for vietnamese; then it was >renamed to X5 with a few modifications. T5 is a minor update -- it's >heavily based on X5 but I don't remember what has been changed. Thanks. The questions now seem to be, is there a significant amount of fonts/support files/work that relied on x5 that needs to be supported? Because I just discovered that there were some serious bugs in the ConTeXt interpretation of the x5 encoding, and that any regular user would have demanded that something be changed! Cheers, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-