ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adam Lindsay" <atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: No performance improvement under OS X with new beta?
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:33:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050304193350.28073@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8804232638e47c877012204140e3c2a8@indiana.edu>

Matthias Weber said this at Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:35:13 -0500:

>> Were both runs from the same point--were they "virgin" runs?
>> Did you precede the texexec command with a "texutil --purgeall" 
>> command,
>> for example?
>> -- 
>>
>
>
>My TeX source file is a single file with images. Most of the TeX-work 
>is done for positioning
>floats I think (figures, tables) and for creating backgrounds.
>
>So I just renamed the TeX file for both runs into new file names, and 
>upated TeX for the second run.
>I can redo the experiment on a clone machine which hasn't been updated 
>yet, but I don't
>know whether "texutil --purgeall" will change anything. But if you tell 
>me that it will, I'll give it a try.

Hmm. If you renamed the file for each run, then ignore that advice. I
don't think that would be it, then.
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk
 Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-04 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-04 13:44 ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-04 13:49 ` Mark Smith
2005-03-04 15:58   ` OSX ConTeXt users inventory (was: ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated) Maurice Diamantini
2005-03-04 16:03   ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated David Wooten
2005-03-04 16:29     ` Thomas A.Schmitz
2005-03-04 19:50       ` Alan Bowen
2005-03-04 21:43         ` Steve Peter
2005-03-05  9:31           ` h h extern
2005-03-04 16:48     ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 17:13       ` No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 17:20         ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-04 18:35           ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-04 19:33             ` Adam Lindsay [this message]
2005-03-05  9:17               ` h h extern
2005-03-04 17:24         ` Hans Hagen
2005-03-04 18:43           ` Matthias Weber
2005-03-05  9:20             ` h h extern
2005-03-09  8:09         ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-04 14:07 ` ConTeXt-updater i-Package updated Gerben Wierda
2005-03-04 20:13 No performance improvement under OS X with new beta? Steffen Wolfrum
2005-03-05  9:15 ` h h extern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050304193350.28073@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk \
    --to=atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).