From: "Michael Fuchs" <Michael.Fuchs@hiskp.uni-bonn.de>
Subject: AW: Re: Line break after unit or \cite command
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:47:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050310174721.CF4205D4F8@sunkist.iskp.uni-bonn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m23bv3fmvl.fsf@levana.de>
Hi Patrick!
I want ConTeXt to produce the line break after the \EVolt
command. The unit and following word together are extending
the textwidth. Put TeX doesn't do the linebreak after the
unit. Even using this "\ " macro doesn't have an effect on
this behaviour!
Michael
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl
> [mailto:ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl] Im Auftrag von Patrick Gundlach
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. März 2005 18:10
> An: ntg-context@ntg.nl
> Betreff: [NTG-context] Re: Line break after unit or \cite command
>
> Hello Michael,
>
>
> [...]
>
> > Im Energiebereich bis XXXX~\EVolt\ wurden die Ergebnisse der
> > Kollaboration bestätigt.
> >
> > ConTeXt breaks "wurden" in "wur"-"den".
>
> But then TeX thinks that there is feasible breakpoint between EVolt
> and wurden. I'd write this 3\,\EVolt\ wurden.
>
> Patrick
> --
> ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-10 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-10 15:11 Michael Fuchs
2005-03-10 15:16 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-03-10 15:36 ` AW: " Michael Fuchs
2005-03-10 17:10 ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-10 17:47 ` Michael Fuchs [this message]
2005-03-10 19:42 ` AW: " Peter Münster
2005-03-10 22:15 ` AW: " Michael Fuchs
2005-03-11 8:41 ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-11 10:34 ` AW: " Michael Fuchs
2005-03-11 18:24 ` Peter Münster
2005-03-11 19:15 ` AW: " Michael Fuchs
2005-03-13 17:48 ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-13 20:41 ` AW: AW: " h h extern
2005-03-14 9:59 ` Patrick Gundlach
2005-03-14 18:10 ` AW: AW: " Peter Münster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050310174721.CF4205D4F8@sunkist.iskp.uni-bonn.de \
--to=michael.fuchs@hiskp.uni-bonn.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).