Re: iso latin 2 ; storm fonts

["Adam Lindsay" <atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk>]

Vit Zyka said this at Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:31:50 +0200:

>> I'd call your st1 an EC variant, st2 an XL2 variant, and st3 some sort of
>> custom expert encoding. Ultimately names aren't *that* important, but
>> they can help a lot when others try to pick up and understand your work.
>
>Thank you Adam for your suggestion. Your naming convention has a logic. 
>The reason why I do not use it is that I utilized work of Petr Olsak. I 
>am using all *.tfm, *.map and *.enc files. I believe it is not a 
>drawback for ConTeXt but it is advantage for me: do not prepare hundreds 
>of metric files.

I actually had gone back and re-thought that suggestion (especially after
examining Olsak's OFS in further detail). As the st1 does have
*character* (and not just *glyph*) differences from EC, it really is a
different encoding.

Again, great stuff. Thanks!
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk
 Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-