ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: no 'd' in math-eul.tex
@ 2005-05-09  9:01 Johan Sandblom
  2005-05-09  9:43 ` Adam Lindsay
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Johan Sandblom @ 2005-05-09  9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)


If 'c' and 'C' in your example are changed to
'd' and 'D', it illustrates the point. I also have
the fonts installed following your excellent guide.

Johan

-- 
Johan Sandblom  N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh  
t +46851776108  17176 Stockholm  
m +46735521477  Sweden           
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the 
will to find out, which is the exact opposite" 
-- Bertrand Russell

----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Lindsay <atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk>
Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 10:05 am
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex

> Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200:
> 
> >making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a
> >mistake? 
> 
> Huh? I think those hex values are correct.
> Do you have a test case that doesn't work for you? This works for 
> me (I
> have the EulerVM fonts installed):
> 
> \definetypeface[cheu][rm][serif][charter][default][encoding=ec]
> \definetypeface[cheu][mm][math][euler][euler][rscale=1.05]
> \setupbodyfont[cheu]
> 
> \starttext
> \startformula
> A + B + C = A^{B^C}
> \stopformula
> \startformula
> a + b + c = a^{b^c}
> \stopformula
> 
> \stoptext
> 
> -- 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk
> Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
> Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* no 'D' in math-eul.tex
@ 2005-12-27 17:14 Johan Sandblom
  2005-12-27 19:35 ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Johan Sandblom @ 2005-12-27 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)


In May I discovered that there was a typo in math-eul.tex rendering
the lower-case 'd' an 'e'. Amazingly, the same problem occurs also for
the upper-case 'D', and requires changing the line

\definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["45]

into

\definemathcharacter [D] [nothing] [mr] ["44]

Apparently this beautiful font is severely underused to allow this
typo to survive!

Regards, Johan
--
Johan Sandblom  N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh
t +46851776108  17176 Stockholm
m +46735521477  Sweden
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite"
- Bertrand Russell

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: no 'd' in math-eul.tex
@ 2005-05-09 11:08 Johan Sandblom
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Johan Sandblom @ 2005-05-09 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)


Thanks, I already repaired it, I just thought it should not be propagated
further ...

-- 
Johan Sandblom  N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh  
t +46851776108  17176 Stockholm  
m +46735521477  Sweden           
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the 
will to find out, which is the exact opposite" 
-- Bertrand Russell

----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Lindsay <atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk>
Date: Monday, May 9, 2005 11:50 am
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] no 'd' in math-eul.tex

> OKAY!
> Ignore my last two messages! :| Sorry, I've been "distracted" by 
> this EU
> project meeting where I'm sitting.
> 
> You're absolutely right. This is a stupid, stupid bug. You can fix 
> thiswith a patch like the following, in your favourite patch-
> putting-place:
> 
> \starttypescript[math][euler][special]
> \startmathcollection [eul]
>  \definemathcharacter [d]   [nothing] [mr] ["64]
>  \definemathcharacter [D]   [nothing] [mr] ["44]
> \stopmathcollection
> \stoptypescript
> 
> I don't have anything against the letter 'd'. Honest!
> 
> aeam linesay
> 
> Johan Sandblom said this at Mon, 9 May 2005 09:14:29 +0200:
> 
> >In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser
> >dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the 
> following lines 
> >occur
> >
> >...
> >\definemathcharacter [c]   [nothing] [mr] ["63]
> >\definemathcharacter [d]   [nothing] [mr] ["65]
> >\definemathcharacter [e]   [nothing] [mr] ["65]
> >\definemathcharacter [f]   [nothing] [mr] ["66]
> >...
> >
> >and
> >
> >...
> >\definemathcharacter [C]   [nothing] [mr] ["43]
> >\definemathcharacter [D]   [nothing] [mr] ["45]
> >\definemathcharacter [E]   [nothing] [mr] ["45]
> >\definemathcharacter [F]   [nothing] [mr] ["46]
> >...
> >
> >making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a
> >mistake? 
> >
> >Regards, Johan
> >
> >-- 
> >Johan Sandblom  N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh  
> >t +46851776108  17176 Stockholm  
> >m +46735521477  Sweden           
> >"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the 
> >will to find out, which is the exact opposite" 
> >-- Bertrand Russell
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >ntg-context mailing list
> >ntg-context@ntg.nl
> >http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> 
> -- 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl@comp.lancs.ac.uk
> Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
> Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* no 'd' in math-eul.tex
@ 2005-05-09  7:14 Johan Sandblom
  2005-05-09  8:05 ` Adam Lindsay
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Johan Sandblom @ 2005-05-09  7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)


In the math-eul.tex shown in the contextgarden.net source browser
dated 2003.02.03, which is the only one I have found, the following lines 
occur

...
\definemathcharacter [c]   [nothing] [mr] ["63]
\definemathcharacter [d]   [nothing] [mr] ["65]
\definemathcharacter [e]   [nothing] [mr] ["65]
\definemathcharacter [f]   [nothing] [mr] ["66]
...

and

...
\definemathcharacter [C]   [nothing] [mr] ["43]
\definemathcharacter [D]   [nothing] [mr] ["45]
\definemathcharacter [E]   [nothing] [mr] ["45]
\definemathcharacter [F]   [nothing] [mr] ["46]
...

making 'd' and 'D' print as 'e' and 'E'. I suppose this is a
mistake? 

Regards, Johan

-- 
Johan Sandblom  N8, MRC, Karolinska sjh  
t +46851776108  17176 Stockholm  
m +46735521477  Sweden           
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the 
will to find out, which is the exact opposite" 
-- Bertrand Russell

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-27 19:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-09  9:01 no 'd' in math-eul.tex Johan Sandblom
2005-05-09  9:43 ` Adam Lindsay
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-27 17:14 no 'D' " Johan Sandblom
2005-12-27 19:35 ` Hans Hagen
2005-05-09 11:08 no 'd' " Johan Sandblom
2005-05-09  7:14 Johan Sandblom
2005-05-09  8:05 ` Adam Lindsay
2005-05-09  9:46 ` Hans Hagen
2005-05-09  9:50 ` Adam Lindsay

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).