From: David Antos <xantos@informatics.muni.cz>
Subject: Re: Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:22:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050821162208.GA16657@erik.fi.muni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4308A106.70305@elvenkind.com>
Hello Taco,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> The "a while" turned out to be around 1999, and the code (hack) I
> used back then is no longer even remotely usable (for one because
> context was still in dutch, then), but I'll see if I can update my
> patch.
:-), that's great :-).
In the meantime, I solved the second part, i.e., adding the additional
describing text. It goes somehow like this (well, it's a hack, but it
works):
% MathParagraph is the enumeration (it ensures references and numbering,
% and typesetting all the texts). In command, it calls a macro that refers
% to \MathParagraphType etc.
\def\startLemma{\dosingleempty\dostartLemma}
\def\dostartLemma[#1]#2 {%
\def\MathParagraphType{Lemma}
\def\MathParagraphName{#2}
\def\MathParagraphList{MathParagraphs}
\iffirstargument
\startMathParagraph[#1]
\else
\startMathParagraph
\fi
}
\let\stopLemma\stopMathParagraph
So I can use
\startLemma[reference]{Algorithm xyz terminates}
...
\stopLemma
I came to the idea to misuse command= to typeset the header and write to
the list, it is given an argument containing the number of the enumeration.
Anyway, it is not easy to feed it into \expanded{\writetolist...} as the
argument is something with \edef and a pile of pretty ugly macros :-), so I
still use \precedingsectionnumber\numberMathParagraph :-(
To sum up, a good way to obtain current enumeration number (in a form that
goes into lists, etc.) would be completely enough, provided that one
writes hacks to solve the rest (and does end up finding the real macro
names with \tracingmacros=1 :-)). Creating something like
enumerateddescription (a description with names and possibility to write
lists) would be much nicer, of course :-))
Thank you very much,
D.A.
P.S.: Hans said once that a Dutch mathematical journal is typeset with
ConTeXt. Do you have an idea how they typeset theorems?
--
Two million robots: (Once a tune has been worked out, the accompaniment
should be played on a very echoey synthesiser whilst the two million
robots sing exactly a flattened fifth out of tune. It will sound more
ghastly than you can possibly imagine.)
-- Douglas Adams (in a script of H2G2 radio series)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-21 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-19 9:48 David Antos
2005-08-21 12:27 ` David Antos
2005-08-21 15:43 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-08-21 16:22 ` David Antos [this message]
2005-08-24 20:01 ` Rob Ermers
2005-08-24 20:40 ` David Antos
2005-08-25 10:07 ` Taco Hoekwater
2005-08-25 20:38 ` David Antos
2005-08-29 21:26 ` Hans Hagen Outside
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050821162208.GA16657@erik.fi.muni.cz \
--to=xantos@informatics.muni.cz \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).